What best explains why a written argument without transitions might not work? O The relationship between the examples and the conclusion would be unclear and hard to understand.
O The relationship between ideas would lack the appropriate emphasis and logical flow.
O The relationship between the claim, reasons, and evidence would be too vague and wouldn't make sense.
O The relationship between different parts of the argument would be unclear and hard to follow.

Esther is a person and who makes friends easily. parallel structure how?

How might a reader find tables charts or graphs useful

“tell me o swan, your ancient tale” by kabir “the swan” by rilke “spanish dancer” by rilke “your laughter” by pablo neruda “birthplace” by shaffarzadeh “it’s this way” by nazim hikmet “counting small-boned bodies” by robert bly choose two poems that you would like to write about. analyze each poem. study the perspective, or point of view, of the speaker in each of the two poems that you select for this assignment. consider these questions: who is the speaker in each of these poems? what is the speaker’s tone? is there a conflict? is there a message? what does each of the poems have in common? what is different about each of the poems? which literary devices are used in the poems? are these literary devices found in both of the poems? what does the speaker hope to achieve in each of the poems? how are these achievements/goals been met? directions: using the two poems of your choosing, write a clear, concise, two hundred and fifty word essay that compares and contrasts the two poems. make sure you include at least two of the following to support your thesis: tone, point of view, literary devices, and meter.