Which revision best uses a phrase to combine the first two sentences? There was a raging forest storm. Deep in the forest, a storm was raging. To escape the storm, forest animals hid. To the animals of the forest, a storm raged.

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

There was a raging storm. It was in the forest. Rain fell.

Leaves rustled as the wind swept through the trees.

Squirrels hid as the sky opened up. All the birds, nestled

in the trees, quieted and stopped chirping.

There was a raging forest storm.

Deep in the forest, a storm was raging.

To escape the storm, forest animals hid.

To the animals of the forest, a storm raged.

Which revision best uses a phrase to combine the first two sentences? There was a raging forest storm. Deep in the forest, a storm was raging. To escape the storm, forest animals hid. To the animals of the forest, a storm raged.

Deep in the forest, a storm was raging.

Explanation:

The first two lines in the text above create the feeling of devastation created by the storm, so the option "Deep in the forest, a storm was raging" may be the most appropriate to establish a good review that combines the two phrases. This is because this option keeps the meaning of the text, but it has a more succinct and direct sentence, which allows the reader to have a faster and optimized understanding.

a i thinkmark me brainliest

explanation:

the answer to your question is d because the clause conveys the tone of the man in the excerpt, which is arrogant and cocky. hope that .