What are three differences between the Twelve Angry Men book and the movie made in 1997 based off of it? Help is appreciated, as I don't have time to watch the movie before it's due.

1. The movie puts you more in the vision of the jurors at times. Ways they do that is by moving the camera like you are walking through the building. This is different then reading their lines in the play from a possibly more detached perspective.

2. The movie actually shows the boy, rather than how you only read mentions of him in the book. This possibly humanizes him more to the watcher or possibly makes them think more on if he actually did it based on looking at him.

3. The movie also possibly shows more of Juror 3's reactions and emotions than reading them in a play had done, like how he quietly walks out the door with the torn-up photo of his son left behind, which helps the watcher understand why he changes his mind in the end and generally enhances his character.

Explanation:

I think you should watch the movie maybe, just to see it, I suppose.

given the fact that the question is about the detail that best support the idea that oppressive leaders use   propaganda to achieve thir goals,   the first option does not refer to any kind of propaganda, since it only tells about that the milk and the windfall apple should be reserved for the pigs. in the second option, that is, "snowball and napoleon sent out flights of pigeons whose instructions were to mingle with the animals on the neighbouring farms, tell them the story of the rebellion, and teach them the tune of "beasts of england". it can be identified that the oppressors make use of the propaganda, which is represented by the pigeons, and the information they have to tell other animals about what was happening in the farm in order to get their objectives. for that reason, the right answer is the second option, taking into account that the third option do not refer to propaganda since it only talks about that they did not want jones back. and, finally, the last option refers to the result of the given news, but it does not mean about the propaganda they used to achieve their goals.

what is your question?