What did people say about Jordan and his family after they climbed Mount Everest?
They were wrong to let Jordan climb.
They were the smartest family ever to allow Jordan to climb.
They were only trying to attract public attention.
They were a money-hungry family.
Jordan Romero's goal is to help other kids

go on any trip to see the biggest mountain
chase their dreams or goals
tell their parents to support their child's dream
see how risky mountaineering is
What did Jordan do to encourage young people to be active and happy at the end of the story?

He started a new mission to climb the highest peak in each state.
He climbed another mountain and put it on TV.
He opened a center to teach kids how to climb mountains.
He founded a group for mountaineers.
What is the risk of mountaineering?

freezing or hypothermia
happiness
awards
death
What question does the writer ask at the beginning of the story?

How high is Mount Everest?
Can parents go too far in supporting their children's dreams?
What is the highest mountain in the world?
What are the risks of mountaineering?
Which of the following is NOT an argument against Jordan climbing mountains?

Jordan is climbing mountains for fame.
Jordan doesn't have the cognitive ability.
Jordan has dreams and goals to fill.
Jordan can get hurt because mountaineering is dangerous.
What do the "Seven Summits refer to?

A very famous group
Jordan's dream
The tallest mountain on each of 7 continents
The number of mountains Jordan has climbed
First and Last Name *
Jordan Romero is the youngest in the world to climb which mountain?

Mount Kilimanjaro
Mount St. Helen
Mount Kilauea
Mount Everest
What does Paul Romero claim about Jordan?

Jordan was too young to climb the mountain.
Jordan was up to the challenge and not at risk.
Jordan wanted to climb mountains so he could become famous.
None of the above.
In the sentence, "Jordan persevered through, and in July 2006, when he was 10-years old, Jordan and his family climbed 19, 300 foot-high Mountain Kilimanjaro," what does 'persevere' mean?

a dispute or disagreement
using reason to make judgments
continued in spite of obstacles
gave up