How does Washington support his argument that any constitutional changes should be made according to the law and by the people? A. by warning that changing the law by other meansisthe usually the downfall of government ruled by the people B. by explaining that following constitutional law is the most logical procedure C. by stating that he is aware of a plot of several factions to try to seize control of the government D. by suggesting only fools would try to change the constitution if they were not part of the group who originally drafted it

1- cleans/ tidies up

2- were

3-would be

4- had known

5-takes

6-must be/ have to be/should be

answer: the first one

explanation:

explicitly is defined as “in a clear and detailed manner, leaving no room for confusion or doubt.” the rest are interpretive and not clearly proven leaving in fact possible “confusion or doubt” which explicitly, by definition cannot have.

if this isnt a true or false than they have equal amount of importants

type of error:

the error in the sentence is a "dangling modifier". a dangling modifier is a phrase, word or clause that "dangles" because there is not target to modify. in this case, "after mopping the floor" is the dangling modifier since it has no word to modify. the noun "house" cannot mop the floor; therefore there is a mistake in the writing of the sentence.