It is believed that the Gawain Poet wrote Sir Gawain and the Green Knight in the late 1300s, nearing the end of what is generally considered the age of chivalry. Though legend has it that Gawain was one of Arthur’s finest and most loyal knights, the Gawain poet tells a story in which this hero is flawed. What might the poet’s intention have been to depict a fabled knight in this way as the age of chivalry was waning?

On the one hand, the moral of the bundle of sticks, reflects on the idea that "union makes strength": when each of the sons tried to break the entire bundle of sticks, no one was able to do it. therefore, the dying father tells them: "untie the bundle and each of you take a stick", so the sons were finally able to break the sticks, by breaking them individually, but in the end, through the union of the brother's forces, altogether.on the other hand, the moral of "hofus the stonecutter", refers to how people unecessarily want to be superior in hierarchy in society. the tale shows how a stonecutter always wishes to become someone or something superior than him, for instance, when he sees that the cloud is stronger than the sun (when he was the sun), so he wishes to be "the storm". but in the end, he realizes the stonecutter was the strongest of all.

In order for me to answer this question you’ll have to be more specific

Wait what thats wrong! isnt it considered third person pov when the text doesnt use i and me throught out the if it did use i and me through out the story then it will be considered first person and i dont understand your question.