How does literature/logical research inform our ideas about fate vs free will. (Provide an example- text to text or text to world) NOTE YOUR ANSWER MUST BE AT LEAST ONE PARAGRAPH
ONE SENTENCE ANSWER WOULD NOT BE ACCEPTED

Answer and Explanation:

The relationship between destiny and libre arbitrio is very intimate and can often confuse us and make us see these two factors as being the same thing. Literature, however, have the capacity to establish a full difference between these two factors by showing us examples of how to differentiate them and allowing, even that these examples are identifiable in our life. According to the literature, free will is our ability to be free and not submit to fate, but to make fate manipulated by ourselves. We can see an example of this in "Jane Eyre" where, Jane refuses her destiny to be a socially fragile woman and without the ability to take care of herself and makes choices that lead her to be a strong woman and owner of herself. We can also see another example in "Romeo and Juliet" where the two lovers refuse the fate of being separated and choose to be together until after death. There are many other examples that can be cited, but all show the ability of literature to show us that destiny is a factor of free will and not free will a factor of destiny.

true. the definition explains it: a word or phrase that modifies or qualifies an adjective, verb, or other adverb or a word group, expressing a relation of place, time, circumstance, manner, cause, degree, etc. this is a dictionary definition that i have looked up in a dictionary.

learning how to embrace the effects of colonialism is one of the central ideas of the play.