subject
English, 20.11.2020 18:40 hellokitty9440

Read the excerpt from The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind by William Kamkwamba. The wind would spin the blades of the windmill, rotate the magnets in a dynamo, and create electricity. Attach a wire to the dynamo and you could power anything, especially a bulb. All I needed was a windmill, and then I could have lights. No more kerosene lamps that burned our eyes and sent us gasping for breath. With a windmill, I could stay awake at night reading instead of going to bed at seven with the rest of Malawi. Which line from the excerpt shows an implied detail that provides context about Malawi and how the windmill would benefit its people?

A. Attach a wire to the dynamo and you could power anything, especially a bulb.

B. No more kerosene lamps that burned our eyes and sent us gasping for breath.

C. All I needed was a windmill, and then I could have lights.

D. The wind would spin the blades of the windmill, rotate the magnets in a dynamo, and create electricity.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 05:50
What idea-generating technique allows members to intentionally develop unconventional or outlandish ideas? brainstorming
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:00
In an indians fathers plea medicine grizzly bear lake makes the argument that wind wolf is a slow learner how does he fail to build a strong argument?
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:50
Ikeep getting differentand provide an explanation! even if it's a minor read the sample student claim."i strongly feel that advertising should be banned during children's television shows." is this an effective claim? a. yes, because it offers an opinion that everyone believes to be true.b. yes, because it expresses an indisputable statement of fact.c. no, because it does not offer an opinion that can be argued against. d. no, because it only expresses a personal preference or feeling.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 16:30
Which sentence best uses transitions to explain how the evidence supports the reason in the accompanying claim statement? clearly, rainsford did not kill zaroff in self-defense. this statement, therefore, shows that rainsford killed zaroff in self-defense. so, rainsford is not justified because there is no proof he acted in self-defense. in the end, rainsford is not justified in killing zaroff.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Read the excerpt from The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind by William Kamkwamba. The wind would spin the...
Questions
question
Biology, 09.04.2020 21:31
question
Mathematics, 09.04.2020 21:31