In what way is the confrontation between tybalt and Romeo in Act 3 chiefly IRONIC?

I think that you would expect Romeo to fight.  But, now that he is married and a "man" he wants to attempt to restore peace instead of fight.  Tybalt gives a verbal attack on Romeo.  Romeo does not want to fight him.  Romeo throws himself between the two that are fighting in order to make them chill and do the "right thing".  Romeo is now very angry that Mercutio dies.  He thinks it should be him in Mercutio's place.  Tybalt comes back into the picture and Romeo draws his sword to fight.  Romeo kills Tybalt.  Romeo has to now RUN.  Now he is the "fool".  Even though Romeo was trying to get everyone to keep the peace - Lady Capulet - Juliet's mom, Tybalt's aunt...wants Romeo's life in place of Tybalt's life.  Romeo is then exiled and if he is found he will be killed.  Well, you know the ending - he dies anyways.  Was his death in vain; was it because he took another life? Was it his love for Juliet?  Was he depressed and realized he could never have a good life with his LOVE forever and ever

Explanation:

Remember that the word ironic is something that is happening in the opposite way in which you expected it to happen.  

What is the irony in the encounter between Tybalt and Romeo in Scene 1? Both Juliet and Romeo react to the news of Romeo's banishment by saying that... it is no better than death.

Explanation: