How are the cottager and his wife in “The Hen and the Golden Eggs” similar to the miser in “The Miser?” What lesson is Aesop teaching in both fables?

Based on the information, it can be noted that the cottager, his wife and miser are similar in that they give gold too much importance.

It should be noted that the cottager and his wife in “The Hen and the Golden Eggs” are similar to the miser in “The Miser”

This is because they give too much importance to gold thereby giving a value that gold does not deserve. Their love for gold made them greedy and selfish.

Learn more about excerpts on:

link

The cottager and his wife and miser are similar in that they give gold too much importance.

Explanation:

The cottager and his wife and miser are people who let gold control their feelings, giving a value that gold does not deserve. The cottager and his wife, made gold their source of greed by sacrificing things that were more important than him, like the chicken. The miser, on the other hand, gave importance to obsolete gold, which would not be used and only served to inflate the miser's ego.

Aesop, uses these two fables to pass a great moral lesson. In "The Hen and the Golden Eggs" he shows that whoever wants everything is left with nothing and that greed makes people devalue the true wealth they have. "The Miser," on the other hand, presents the lesson that the value of things is defined by their usefulness, if a valuable thing like gold is not used and becomes obsolete, it makes it as valuable as a stone. In addition, history shows that being stingy allows a person not to enjoy its own riches, leaving them to other people.

answer: fog is black

explanation:

cause idek what ur talking about and you should learn it ur self

in "people in peace, not profit and war" chrisholm uses inductive reasoning for her argument against defense spending by stating that the new administration, like most americans, wanted to invest in social objectives, so they must not want to prioritize defense spending. mr. nixon said "we can delay no longer in launching new approaches to the problem that beset them", but chrisholm points out that the programs were delayed anyways.