HELP QUICK PLEASE. Which statement best explains a weakness in the author's use of appeal in the passage?
A. The author should have listed specific academic classes that
require focus and effort.
O B. The author should have used a stronger emotional appeal about
how much she hates gym class.
C. The author should not have made a value judgement about
whether students have time outside of school to exercise.
D. The author should not have used a logical appeal about the
difficulty and importance of academics in high school.

I believe that it is D. hope this helps if not tell me

she was killed in her home during hurricane katrina. b.she was relocated to another town after hurricane katrina. c.she died trying to get victims of the hurricane to safety. d.she is still missing — police do not know where she is.

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.