As the Yale psychologist Molly Crockett has argued, the normal forces that might stop us from joining an outrage mob—such as time to reflect and cool off, or feelings of empathy for a person being humiliated—are attenuated when we can’t see the person’s face, and when we are asked, many times a day, to take a side by publicly “liking” the condemnation. Can you please help me paraphrase this, for my essay! It’s very important!

Thank you !

Read the statement below and decide whether you agree or disagree with it. be prepared to support opinion with details from the reading and video. here's your discussion prompt through wn terms ocumel also ec it's more difficult to keep bias out of video news than textual news,

Write a syllogism in the space provided below. if written for me, you will receive 40

Plz (i only understand "the song of wandering aengus." and i have no idea what the raven means so i can't answer this. me i will give brainlest and a 5-star rating) consider the speakers in "the raven" and the speaker in "the song of wandering aengus." write two paragraphs to compare and contrast the voice in these two poems. how does the poet give the speaker in each poem a distinctive voice? what effect does this voice have in each poem? use examples from each poem to as evidence for your answer