Need this asap ill mark brainliest Search online to find at least two articles that have opposite opinions on the repeated breeding of pedigree dogs. Does one article seem more scientifically credible than the other? Explain your answer.

it took too much time

Explanation:

A veterinarian wrote an article stating his disapproval of some of the tactics used to breed pedigree dogs. He stated that pedigree dogs can be healthy, but because of inbreeding, they’re more likely to have health problems than other dogs. The author supported his statement with scientific studies.

A breeder with 20 years of experience wrote an article that was pro-breeding. He talked about his own success and shared his opinions on proper breeding techniques. Because the veterinarian used scientific facts to support his reasoning, his article seemed more scientifically credible to me.

abater   ambary   ambery   baryta   baryte   bemata   betray   jarvey   ramate   ramjet

explanation:

those are all the possible words

can you explain your question better