*QUESTIONS ARE AT THE BOTTOM* *WILL MARK BRAINIEST ANSWER*
*Nixon Transcript will be in the comments*
*QUESTIONS*
1. What is the purpose of the argument?

3. What is the point of view of the argument? Who is the intended audience?

4. What is Nixon’s claim?

5. What evidence is provided to support the claims
Is a counterclaim presented? If so, how is it refuted or weakened?

6. How convincing is the argument presented by Nixon? Use details from the reading to support your opinion.

1.Primarily, argument has two purposes: argument is used to change people's points of view or persuade them to accept new points of view; and argument is used to persuade people to a particular action or new behavior.

3.What is the point of view of the argument? Who is the intended audience? ... The point of view is just from his own perspective, he makes questions and answers them himself. The intended audience is for those who oppose Kennedy and those who are indecisive, seeing as he tries to one-up Kennedy the entire time.

4.Besides, he claimed Nixon had an absolute executive privilege to protect communications between "high Government officials and those who advise and assist .

5. The counterclaim is present when Nixon said “I think we disagree on the implication of his remarks tonight andon the.

6.Use details from the reading to support your opinion.His argument that he presented was convincing.

Explanation: Quizlet has all the answers

read this passage from the crisis. what rationale is paine using for going to war with great britain? my own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. not all the treasures of the world, so far as i believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for i think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his absolute will, am i to suffer it? what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? if we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other.

it is waged war against an army of countrymen

it would lead to independence from britain

it would be an offensive war

it would be a defensive war