Which source would be the most credible to use in a research paper about vegetarianism?

a. a published scientific study from a research university
b. the website of an organization that lobbies for the meat industry
c. a pamphlet from an animals-rights group
d. a personal blog from a student attempting to live as a vegetarian
i'm thinking its d?

A published scientific study from a research university would be the most credible source to use in a research paper about vegetarianism.

Explanation:

A published scientific study from a research university would be the most credible source to use in a research paper about vegetarianism. This is because a scientific study is objective and it’s based on premises that are justified by facts and not opinions. The other options may all be biased. The website of an organization that lobbies for the meat industry would probably present ideas contrary to vegetarianism because they’re interested in supporting the meat consumption. A pamphlet from an animals-rights group would also be biased as it would condemn the consumption of meat without taking in consideration the positive aspects of consuming meat, if there are any. Finally, a personal blog wouldn't be a right source as it presents the personal opinions of the person who writes it. In conclusion, a scientific study would be the best source to support the research paper.

a source card is mage during research to tell the facts about the source one is using.

answer: having more negative in their interactions with their child more or likely because of issues with stress and depression.

explanation:

teenage parents may also have less time as they juggle their responsibilities to spend with their child which can make the child feel lonesome and not enough trust was made to create a foundation between the parent and the child.