In Selection 2, the author argues that one failing amongst the scientific community was that Franklin was never nominated for a Nobel Prize for Medicine. Is the evidence supporting the claim valid?

Yes

Explanation:

We can reach this conclusion based on the circumstantial evidence/reasons provided. For example, it is a known fact that scientist, Rosalind Franklin carried out research discoveries that aided other researchers to explain the concepts/makeup of the DNA, etc.

Sadly, she died at a very young age of 37, which ultimately prevented her from been nominated for a Nobel Prize for Medicine.

the message which is being conveyed is that if a person does not have the qualified skills to be an writer then he should not and if he becomes then just leave it away..

i think this is it plz check