HELP PLEASE I'LL GIVE BRAINLIST AND POINTS!! Think about cultural or family traditions you would want to take with you if you had to move to another country.
Write a 1 page reflection about these traditions and draw a representational picture. What if you moved to a place where these traditions were unacceptable or even illegal? How might you feel? Might you try to keep doing them, but secretly?

btw, 2-4 paragraphs if GREAT, it doesn't have to be a page

in "people in peace, not profit and war" chrisholm uses inductive reasoning for her argument against defense spending by stating that the new administration, like most americans, wanted to invest in social objectives, so they must not want to prioritize defense spending. mr. nixon said "we can delay no longer in launching new approaches to the problem that beset them", but chrisholm points out that the programs were delayed anyways.

the answer would be c   i believe thats the most reasonable answer

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.