Did any of the articles or videos seem biased to you? explain why. The articles are the melting ice and Energy, Carbon Dioxide, and Earth's Future,

The language in the carbon dioxide article makes the authors sound biased. The article uses negative language to dismiss the opposing point of view. This language includes words such as illogical and misperceptions and phrases such as "prophecies of doom" and "retrogressive policy." The authors also use excessively forceful language to support their conclusion. Some examples include "proven, beyond any doubt," "CO2 is the elixir of life," and "Don't mess with success!".

Explanation:

answer: idk

explanation:

may i know the title of the book?