Keisha is writing a research paper on the dangers of distracted driving for her social studies class. She is allowed to use two websites for her sources but one must provide factual data and research information. She finds a website set up by a mother whose son was killed in a car accident by another driver who was texting and driving. Keisha locates the author's name on the website, and the site looks professional. However, the mother not only calls the other driver names, but also says that the other driver's parents did not raise him right. Should she use this website as a source of factual evidence? Why? A. Yes, she should use the site because it will be a good resource against the distracted driver argument. B. No, she should not use the site because people who have been directly affected by something are too close to it to be objective and offer neutral facts. C. No, she should look for a website that focuses on the facts and data surrounding this issue as her fact resource. She may choose to use other information from this site for other aspects of her paper. D. Yes, she should use the site because it is a credible resource. Distracted drivers are terrible people, and they need to be stopped!