subject
English, 23.09.2020 14:01 StephenCurry34

Read the third stanza from the poem "Sympathy." I know why the caged bird sings, ah me,

When his wing is bruised and his bosom sore,—

When he beats his bars and he would be free;

It is not a carol of joy or glee,

But a prayer that he sends from his heart’s deep core,

But a plea, that upward to Heaven he flings—

I know why the caged bird sings!

Part A

In the third stanza of the poem "Sympathy," what can be inferred about why the bird beats its wings against the bar?

to try to signal its owner to release it

to keep time to the music in its heart

to attempt to fly despite being caged

to send a prayer to be released from its cage

Question 2
Part B

Which line from the third stanza in the poem best supports the answer in Part A?

"When his wing is bruised and his bosom sore,—"

"But a plea, that upward to Heaven he flings—"

"It is not a carol of joy or glee,"

"When he beats his bars and he would be free;"

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 06:10
Which sentence contains a restrictive
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 08:30
Which part of the word scribble means "to write"? a. scrib– b. –ble
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 11:00
Read this sentence: while on vacation, i often relax by reading one of myfavorite books, go to the movies, or swimming in the pool.which revision corrects the parallel structure error? a. while on vacation, i often relax by reading one of my favoritebooks, going to the movies, or swimming in the pool.ob. while on vacation, i often relax by reading one of my favoritebooks, going to the movies, or swim in the pool.oc. while on vacation, i often relax by reading one of my favoritebooks, i like to go to the movies, or go swimming in the pool.od. while on vacation, i often enjoy relaxing by reading one of myfavorite books, go to the movies, or swimming in the pool.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 16:30
Which sentence best uses transitions to explain how the evidence supports the reason in the accompanying claim statement? clearly, rainsford did not kill zaroff in self-defense. this statement, therefore, shows that rainsford killed zaroff in self-defense. so, rainsford is not justified because there is no proof he acted in self-defense. in the end, rainsford is not justified in killing zaroff.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Read the third stanza from the poem "Sympathy." I know why the caged bird sings, ah me,

...
Questions