Read the paragraph. What kind of a house do you live in? Houses come in all different sizes and shapes. Some are of wood while others are of stone or brick.
Brick or adobe houses stay cool in the summer, yet are warm in the winter. The lightweight houses of Japan are designed to survive earthquakes.
Based on the text, what kind of house would be best in a hot desert climate?
O 1. a lightweight house
2
a stone house
3. an adobe house
O4.
a wood house

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ♡ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━  

The different kind of houses (and their uses) are...

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ♡ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━  

I'm not sure if you missed information but based on logic I think the answer is an adobe house.

A lightweight house is designed to survive earthquakes. earthquakes and hot temperatures do not relate.

A stone house was not stated in the article but it wouldn't do better than a brick or adobe house.

A wood house would probably be very hot in a hot climate, or maybe even catch fire. Wood is a main source to make fire. It would most likely trap heat and/or make fire.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ♡ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━  

Adobe houses...

Adobe houses are houses made of soil, water, and sometimes straw. They are mainly used around Mexico. In Mexico, it is very hot, and the soil keeps out the heat. Also, I will add a picture of an adobe house. As you can see in the picture, the climate looks very hot. People build these kind of houses in hot places to stay cool.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ♡ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━  

because it's a cool name

explanation:

read this passage from the crisis. what rationale is paine using for going to war with great britain? my own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. not all the treasures of the world, so far as i believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for i think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his absolute will, am i to suffer it? what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? if we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other.

it is waged war against an army of countrymen

it would lead to independence from britain

it would be an offensive war

it would be a defensive war