Do you feel as if humans are more important than all other creations in the universe? What shapes your opinion? Do you feel as if your opinion has the potential to make life difficult for others who exist in the universe? Does your opinion work to your advantage?

Humans are in no way more important than the rest of the other creations in the universe. This is so because both humans and other living beings must enjoy the same right to life and freedom, which are essential for the balance of life systems on the planet and the peaceful coexistence between species.

No specific situation gives humans any power or superiority over the rest of the species, other than the very nature of each living being and the food relationships between species. Thus, man has certain animals and vegetables for his food, as other animals do among themselves, but in no way does this imply another type of superiority at a general level.

Furthermore, the protection of the diversity of species and living beings is necessary for the conservation of biological stability in the universe, which ultimately contributes to the well-being and quality of life of all species.

Thinking in this way can be positive if awareness is raised regarding this situation and positive actions are promoted that generate respect for the life of species and biological diversity.

hot and dry

i need 20 things so this was just randomly added. hot and dry is the answer

"character is what you are in the dark." dwight lyman moody, in this very witty quotation of his, states we act and think differently when we are "in the dark", that is, when the spotlight is not on us and everyone can see us and consequently judge us. when reading, we tend to be sympathetic to some characters and their dilemmas. by being so, we are saying to ourselves that we agree with those characters' acts and choices, even if they are morally questionable if we have common sense in mind. dwight lyman moody's quotation applies very well to "crime and punishment", by   19th century russian writer fiodor dostoyevsky. raskolnikov, the main character, a former law student who spends his days reflecting upon life and its misery, draws a fatal conclusion: mankind is divided in two main categories: ordinary and extraordinary people. the first are the ones who lead a run-of-the-mill existence and are full of imperfections; the latter are the ones who are spiritually superior, the ones who always know better, and have the right to judge the ordinary ones, as well as eliminate them if for common good. raskolnikov considers himself as belonging to the extraordinary category and decides to kill an old lady who is a money lender and in whose house he rents a small room. raskolnikov compares himself to napoleon, who had the undeniable right to execute tons of people during the war in order to save his nation. of course what the main character decides to do is a horrendous crime, but as readers we feel it is the right thing for him to do, since the victim is a mean old woman who only thinks about money and keeps humiliating her younger sister. what one experiences is a mixture of sympathy and empathy for the character, even though he decides to commit homicide, which is not at all accepted or tolerated by civilized citizens. however, since readers are "in the dark", they allow themselves to feel in ways they would probably never dare to confess to anyone, no matter how nasty or vicious a character can be. after all, they are just reading and doing no harm. in other words, readers are in the dark and can be who they are without being judged.