What's the difference between the need and the opportunity for rhetorical action?

The contrast between the need and the oppurtunity for expository activity is that need elevates the speaker to talk on an issue while opportunity controls them.

The expository circumstance can be characterized as circumstance in which the rhetor looks for potential means to convince and affect individuals in the way of talking.

The expository circumstance is framed by exigence, crowd, and contraints.

Exigence can be characterized as a situtation which adds to the need of composing. Exigence is a circumstance that shows the author need to write to make the crowd mindful of something.

In this way need exigence prompts the speaker to compose and talk on an issue or circumstance that ought to be settled.

Contraints, then again, are those circumstances that limits the speaker from talking. These contraints are the standards that hold onto the speaker.

These contraints incorporate freedoms, limits, time limit, and so on Along these lines, oppotunities will quite often confine the speaker from talking openly about the theme.

For more information, refer the following link:

link

The difference between the need and the opportunity for rhetorical action is that need promotes the speaker to speak on an issue whereas opportunity restrains them.

Explanation:

The rhetorical situation can be defined as situation in which the rhetor seeks possible means to persuade and involve people in the rhetoric.

The rhetorical situation is formed by exigence, audience, and contraints.

Exigence can be defined as a situtation which contributes to the need of writing. Exigence is a situation that shows the writer need to write to make the audience aware of something. Thus need (exigence) prompts the speaker to write and speak on an issue or situation that should be resolved.

Contraints, on the other hand, are those situations that restricts the speaker from speaking. These contraints are the rules that seize the speaker. These contraints include opportunities, limitations, time limit, etc. So, oppotunities tend to restrict the speaker from speaking freely about the topic.

the examples that saki used to represent satire through situational irony are options two (2) and five (5) inasmuch as the wolf thought that looking for a girl in the bushes could be as easy as hunting little pigs at the park, but it took him so much time to find the girl if it had not been not for a silly mistake. also, bertha would have survived to the wolf's hunt if she had not won those medals for goodness, which at the end they were what got her killed by making noise, so winning medals of goodness was not so good achievement, after all.