EASY I AM JUST DUMB Why is Wikipedia a useful source of information in the early stages of a research project?

Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. This means that any information it contains at any particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong. ... Wikipedia generally uses reliable secondary sources, which vet data from primary sources.

Explanation:

Wikipedia is ideal in these situations because it will allow you to find the information, as well as sources which you can research to confirm that information. In any case, you should not cite Wikipedia itself, but the source provided; you should certainly look up the source yourself before citing it.

Why is Wikipedia a good place to begin?

While the wisdom of the crowd doesn't always rule when it comes to objective, fact-based research and writing (unless you're writing a report on Wookies), Wikipedia offers a good way to get your head around a topic and to start narrowing down your research focus so that you can switch to using more commonly accepted .\

i think that the quotes in paragraph 11 contribute to the development of ideas because it provides a good reasoning of the central idea of the text.

i literally just read the book and studied it for months so i could you, but i need to know where these questions are coming from. they are too general.