Every time Lonnie wears her red scarf, her football team wins. So now she wears her red scarf to every game to ensure a victory. Which logical fallacy does the example contain? A. False causality
B. Begging the question
C. Ad hominem
D. Ad populum

A. False Causality

Explanation:

One way to think of this is that correlation doesn't equal causation. Or just because things coincide doesn't mean one thing caused the other.

In this case, it's a coincidence that every time she wears her scarf, her team wins.  his isn't necessarily true since her scarf doesn't directly impact the players' performance. It doesn't directly cause the team to score more points

And this isn't a case of Ad Populum either since it was never stated that a whole group of people think wearing a red scarf will ensure the team victory, only Lonnie thinks so

the speech this question is referring to is president kennedy's special message to the congress on urgent national needs, may 25, 1961

kennedy responds in a very direct and concrete way to those thinking that communism is a positive system:

"yet their aggression is more often concealed than open. they have fired no missiles; and their troops are seldom seen. they send arms, agitators, aid, technicians and propaganda to every troubled area. but where fighting is required, it is usually done by others--by guerrillas striking at night, by assassins striking alone--assassins who have taken the lives of four thousand civil officers in the last twelve months in vietnam alone--by subversives and saboteurs and insurrectionists, who in some cases control whole areas inside of independent nations." (kennedy)

president kennedy presents communism as cowardly, as a hidden and treacherous weapon that strikes from the shadows like thieves, he represents the system as not even being capable of showing and open and overt attack or confrontation. to finish up the response, he expresses that the system attacks even a country's idependence and freedom.

i think its d

hope i can you