Prompt Imagine that your local library has invited community members to submit proposals for a fundraiser. You are the student representative

on the committee to choose the best proposal. Read the two proposals, paying close attention to their similarities and differences.

Consider whether or not each proposal is logistically feasible, which fundraiser will most appeal to members of your community, and

which fundraiser will likely raise more money.

Which proposal do you think the committee should choose? Write an essay in which you make a case for your choice. Support your

argument with references to specific details in each proposal.

This question is incomplete, since it is missing the proposals. I've found them online:

Proposal 1: The best way to get people invested in the library is to show them the joy of reading. For that reason, the library should hold a book sale. People could donate books that they no longer want, and the librarians could find books that the library no longer needs. Volunteers would need to sort the books into categories and arrange them in an inviting way, like at a bookstore. Books should be inexpensive so people will buy more of them – may be fifty cents for paperbacks and two dollars for hardcover books. A book sale would appeal to people of all ages, from little kids to older people. There should also be a table where people can sign up for library cards. That way, if visitors do not find any books they want at the sale, they can come back to the library.

Proposal 2: A great way to make money for the library would be holding a car wash. The softball team at my school raised over $400 at their car wash last year! The car wash could be held in the library parking lot on a Saturday morning. You could ask local high school students to volunteer to wash the cars. That would be a great way to get students involved with the library. It takes two or three volunteers to wash a car quickly, so you would need at least ten volunteers. You could charge around ten dollars per car. Even people who are not very interested in reading like to have a clean car, so you would get a lot of people to stop by who might not otherwise come to a library fundraiser.

The proposal I think the committee should choose is the second proposal.

Explanation:

Since our purpose is to raise money for our library, after a thorough reading of both proposals, I believe the most efficient one to be the second proposal. It is true that the first proposal suggests an activity that is more directly connected to our main object - the library. It also presents the beautiful idea that a book sale would awake people's interest in reading books. However, I believe that idea is as utopian as it is beautiful. Unfortunately, it takes more than just a book sale for that to happen. Besides that, we must take the suggested prices for the books into consideration - between fifty cents and two dollars -, since they will not be very effective. Our purpose is to raise funds, so we need to be efficient to get people to spend their money.

The second proposal, on the other hand, sounds strange and disconnected at first. After all, a car wash does not sound very intellectual or book-related. Still, we must keep in mind that car washes are known to raise a good amount of money more easily. People may not even enjoy reading, but their chances of contributing are higher since those who own a car will probably want to have it cleaned for a good cause. The proposal also stated that not many volunteers would be necessary (only around ten), and we can easily find help when the activity is enjoyable. I believe this proposal has higher chances of effectively raising funds.

send me the link and i qill give u the answer

biographical remarks present the shifting perception and re-interpretation of figures projected by the authors, or by the society represented by the authors. the portrayals in biographical accounts thus reflect the turning view-of-value in course of history. this paper particularly explores the ways in which “heretical” figures are represented in their biographical accounts, focusing on arabic zindīq poets who flourished in the 2nd century a.h. and are known for their extreme or heretic behavior. it will be discussed that the marks of their heretical deeds are presented in different ways, and the actuality of their activity, such as the association with the early theological thinkers (or mutakallimūn in arabic), is occasionally replaced by more narrativized and unrealistic anecdotes in later sources, the tales being reproduced to underscore the value of poets such as humor or quick-wittedness. the anecdotes also can highlight the qualities of their opponents who appear as their refuters. the chronological tracing of their biographical information from multiple sources reveals the fluctuating value of discourses of “heresy,” mirroring the turning religious reality and the imagined quality of the figures lived in the early period. the paper eventually aims to historically contextualize the functions of “speaking-about-heretics” as a subject of narratives, which works as a tool for writers to express manifold contemporar