Which line best represents the resolution of the story?(RL 6.3)a.“The split second the bar note sounded, I leaped into action. This was it.” (Line 6)b.“The music did stop, of course, and I did, too; and as soon as I stopped, I knew it wasjust as well that the music had, because suddenly I was worn out, weak-kneed, andpanting, fit to collapse.” (Lines 18-20)c.“I stood near the top of the hall, by the stage, and I scanned the rows and rows of people. A figure was coming towards me, but I couldn’t make it out properly in thesemi-dusk of the seething room.” (Lines 40-42)d.“‘Did you see me?’ I asked when she finally let me go. ‘I only caught the end of it, love,’ she said, ‘but you were brilliant, absolutely brilliant. You weren’t dancing. You were flying!’ ‘That’s what it feels like,’ I said. ‘Flying.’” (Lines 58-61)

answer: they were written as a long tale

explanation:

i googled it.

i dont know if your mis-read or whatever but that says 30 points also. its not so very surprising knowing that the words he spoke was english, the aspect of his "language" i'd say is pretty rare and is very unique to pronounce.

biographical remarks present the shifting perception and re-interpretation of figures projected by the authors, or by the society represented by the authors. the portrayals in biographical accounts thus reflect the turning view-of-value in course of history. this paper particularly explores the ways in which “heretical” figures are represented in their biographical accounts, focusing on arabic zindīq poets who flourished in the 2nd century a.h. and are known for their extreme or heretic behavior. it will be discussed that the marks of their heretical deeds are presented in different ways, and the actuality of their activity, such as the association with the early theological thinkers (or mutakallimūn in arabic), is occasionally replaced by more narrativized and unrealistic anecdotes in later sources, the tales being reproduced to underscore the value of poets such as humor or quick-wittedness. the anecdotes also can highlight the qualities of their opponents who appear as their refuters. the chronological tracing of their biographical information from multiple sources reveals the fluctuating value of discourses of “heresy,” mirroring the turning religious reality and the imagined quality of the figures lived in the early period. the paper eventually aims to historically contextualize the functions of “speaking-about-heretics” as a subject of narratives, which works as a tool for writers to express manifold contemporar