Create an outline for a speech that connects a theme from this excerpt to your own life. In the first part of the outline, organize an explanation of what Kings theme means

Hello. You forgot to put the excerpt that the question refers to.

The excerpt is the first two paragraphs of Martin Luther King's speech at the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony.

1. He does not believe that his struggle was in vain.

2. He refuses to believe that the Nobel Peace Prize would be given to someone who has failed to change society's thinking on a particular topic.

3. He believes that society will change.

1. Talk about how badness hasn't changed yet.

2. Present how we are rational beings liable to change.

3. Show how we should modify racist and prejudiced concepts in our society

1. Report situations of structural racism that I witnessed and / or participated in.

2. Show how the fight against racism has changed my thoughts.

3. Show what my role is in reducing racism in society.

1. Show how every white person is racist.

2. Show how we are part of a racist and oppressive system.

3. To show how racism is a subject where black people have the right to speak.

4. Show how we can help in this fight.

Explanation:

The outline of a speech provides a diagram showing the categories of topic and points within those categories that will form the necessary arguments for the speech to be created.

In the case of the outline above, we can see that I related Matin Luther King's speech to my position and how my life fits into a racist society. In this way I have established categories that can organize how my outline will be established, in addition to creating points that will guide my writing and will not let me get away from the proposed theme.

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.

which one is underlined?