Isaacson's opinion is that Kota art is "powerful, even if we do not know much about the Kota people. Which evidence
does he use to support this opinion?
Our imagination tells us that we are looking at a human
figure
Its triangles, cylinders, and parts of circles remind us of
eyes, a neck, and hair
It can reach across a hundred years and a language we
don't understand to touch our lives
It excites our imagination, and our imagination turns the
Kota figure into a person