Write an argumentative essay for or against using public money to maintain national landmarks, such as the gateway Arch in St. Louis. i need the conclusion please

A conclusion that is in favour:

"Using public money to maintain national landmarks is a good policy in the sense that a national landmark is a public good: no one can be excluded from enjoying the view of a national landmark like the Arch in St. Louis for example.

Because they are public goods, national landmarks are not likely to be profitable or provided by the private sector in a free market, and for this reason, government intervention in the form of public money becomes necessary".

mark branliest

explanation:

the film includes a female character. in the short story, you can fantasize over, the appearance of the characters, the place of origin of events described in this book, you can imagine absolutely your reality described in a short story. and in the film for you already invented everything, characters, the place of the event.

the answer is

r ≈5.641

plug in the area of 100 yards into the equation

100=

divide each side by pi

≈ 31.8309=

take the square root of each side to find r

=r

r ≈5.641