subject
English, 02.06.2020 21:01 lrg34

Read this passage from chapter 5 of The Prince.

There are, for example, the Spartans and the Romans. The Spartans held Athens and Thebes, establishing there an oligarchy: nevertheless they lost them. The Romans, in order to hold Capua, Carthage, and Numantia, dismantled them, and did not lose them. They wished to hold Greece as the Spartans held it, making it free and permitting its laws, and did not succeed. So to hold it they were compelled to dismantle many cities in the country, for in truth there is no safe way to retain them otherwise than by ruining them. And he who becomes master of a city accustomed to freedom and does not destroy it, may expect to be destroyed by it, for in rebellion it has always the watchword of liberty and its ancient privileges as a rallying point, which neither time nor benefits will ever cause it to forget. And whatever you may do or provide against, they never forget that name or their privileges unless they are disunited or dispersed, but at every chance they immediately rally to them, as Pisa after the hundred years she had been held in bondage by the Florentines.

What is Machiavelli’s primary purpose in writing this passage?

to inform readers about the history of Rome and Sparta and how they built their empires
to inform readers about the fates of the cities conquered by the Spartans and the Romans
to persuade readers that a conquering prince must destroy a former republic if he hopes to hold it
to persuade readers that a republic will remember freedom and someday rebel against a conqueror

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 21:10
Read the passage below and answer the question. marcus had a reputation for being craven. no one had ever seen him do a single brave thing. using context clues, how would you define the word craven in the passage? intense courageous cowardly thoughtful
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:30
In a group discussion, which statement most clearly uses evidence to support a conclusion? a) the author makes some good points, but i feel that he’s ultimately biased. b) the author proves that he’s biased when he uses terms like “silly” and “stupid”. c) the author obviously hates the way fast food tastes, which is why he’s negative. d) the author first criticizes fast food, and then goes in to criticize junk food.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:30
What is your interpretation of “the story of my experiments with turth”?
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 06:30
Review the detail. beethoven chooses to stay when the children beg him to play more. which is the best inference that can be drawn about beethoven?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Read this passage from chapter 5 of The Prince.

There are, for example, the Spartans and...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 10.07.2019 19:00
question
Mathematics, 10.07.2019 19:00
question
Mathematics, 10.07.2019 19:00
question
Mathematics, 10.07.2019 19:00
question
Mathematics, 10.07.2019 19:00