‘Cars are noisy, dirty, smelly and downright dangerous. They should be banned from all town and city centres, allowing people to walk and cycle in peace.' Write a letter to the Minister for Transport arguing your point of view on this statement

The movement of people, animals and product from one location to another is known as transportation.

Dear Minister of Transport,

I understand that your time is spent looking for ways to ensure that people have effective, efficient and reliable transportation so that they can conduct their lives in the way they desire. However, I believe that using cars is not the right way to ensure this. I think that all city centers should be car-free, in order to allow people to walk and cycle easily.

It is a known fact that many accidents occur in cars, and that these often affect young people who do not have much experience driving. Moreover, cars can cause both noise and air pollution, decreasing the quality of live of people who live in the center, as well as those who visit it.

These are enough reasons to ban cars as soon as possible, and I am sure that you will consider this in your future projects.

Thank you for your time,

John Smith

To know more about this statement, refer to the link:

link

This is a personal assignment that only you can complete. However, we can provide some guidance to help you. This is an example of a letter with these specifications:

Dear Minister of Transport,

I understand that your time is spent looking for ways to ensure that people have effective, efficient and reliable transportation so that they can conduct their lives in the way they desire. However, I believe that using cars is not the right way to ensure this. I think that all city centres should be car-free, in order to allow people to walk and cycle easily. It is a known fact that many accidents occur in cars, and that these often affect young people who do not have much experience driving. Moreover, cars can cause both noise and air pollution, decreasing the quality of live of people who live in the centre, as well as those who visit it. These are enough reasons to ban cars as soon as possible, and I am sure that you will consider this in your future projects.

Thank you for your time,

John Smith

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.

the answer is:

to persuade readers that a conquering prince must destroy a former republic if he hopes to hold it.

in the excerpt from "the prince," the author niccolò machiavelli suggests that to take possession of a city and endure the control over it, it is necessary to destroy it first. otherwise, people who have known freedom will eventually turn against the new rulers and fight back to recover their power.