English 1 and 2 Final Exam: Academic Vocabulary: Match the term to the correct definition 1. Abhor 2. Distention 3. Beneficiary 4. Albeit 5. Centrifuge 6. Demurely 7. Ambiguous 8. Apathy 9. Audacious 10. Enlighten 11. Enlist 12. Enamored 13. Augment 14. Austere 15. Avarice 16. Condone 17. Credence 18. Culmination 19. Disparity 20. Duplicity 21. Effigy 22. Persevere 23. What are the 4 types of sentences? Give an example of each type. Definition Choices: a. although b. having a double meaning; open to interpretation c. a person who derives advantage from something; usually a will, insurance policy, or a trust d. a machine that uses centrifugal force to separate fluids of different densities e. enlargement or dilation; ballooning effect f. stern, severe, plain g. to make aware or inform h. modest; reserved in behavior or manner i. to enlarge or make bigger j. to sign up for voluntarily k. loved deeply or cared for l. lack of interest, enthusiasm, or concern m. the highest point of something n. belief or acceptance that something is true o. showing willingness to take bold risks p. to accept and allow q, a crude image representing a hated person or group r. greed or desire for wealth s. intentional deceit in speech or conduct t. to detest or hate strongly u. inequality or difference v. continue on a course of action, even in the face of difficulty

choose from these types:

the innocent

the orphan

the hero

the caregiver

the explorer

the rebel

- the mistakes that have been done in the past will repeat themselves

- you will trust all the wrong people

in night, why are wiesel and his father evacuated from the auschwitz concentration camp? a massive escape makes the nazis question the security of auschwitz. they are assigned to work as laborers in a factory at another camp, buna. hitler has ordered that all remaining jews be relocated within german borders. the german army needs the camp guards to go to the battle front for a last-chance defense.

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this