What moral dilemma does the excerpt express act 5 scene 3 of the tragedy of Julius caesar

This question is incomplete. Here is the complete question:

Read the excerpt from act 5, scene 3, of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar.

MESSALA. Seek him, Titinius, whilst I go to meet

The noble Brutus, thrusting this report

Into his ears. I may say, "thrusting” it,

For piercing steel and darts envenomed

Shall be as welcome to the ears of Brutus

As tidings of this sight.

TITINIUS. Hie you, Messala,

And I will seek for Pindarus the while.

[Exit MESSALA]

Why didst thou send me forth, brave Cassius?

Did I not meet thy friends, and did not they

Put on my brows this wreath of victory,

And bid me give it thee? Didst thou not hear their shouts?

Alas, thou hast misconstrued everything!

But hold thee, take this garland on thy brow.

Thy Brutus bid me give it thee, and I

Will do his bidding. Brutus, come apace,

And see how I regarded Caius Cassius.

By your leave, gods,—this is a Roman’s part:

Come, Cassius’ sword, and find Titinius’ heart.

What moral dilemma does this excerpt express?

A)Titinius feels guilty that Cassius is dead, and decides he must kill himself.

B)Brutus feels guilty that Cassius is dead, and decides to give him a garland.

C)Messala has to decide whether to tell Brutus about Cassius or to kill Pindarus.

D)Titinius has to decide whether to tell Brutus about Cassius or to kill Pindarus.

The correct answer is option A)Titinius feels guilty that Cassius is dead, and decides he must kill himself.

Explanation:

The moment Titinus finds himself alone on the scene, he starts talking to Cassius, who is actually supposed to be dead already.

This causes great guilt to Titinus who decides that he must kill himself. This act will be carried out through the Cassius sword, as we can see at the end of the excerpt:

"By your leave, gods, —this is a Roman’s part:

Come, Cassius ’sword, and find Titinius’ heart. "

read this passage from the crisis. what rationale is paine using for going to war with great britain? my own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. not all the treasures of the world, so far as i believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for i think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his absolute will, am i to suffer it? what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? if we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other.

it is waged war against an army of countrymen

it would lead to independence from britain

it would be an offensive war

it would be a defensive war

i decided to stay late in the laboratory to continue my experiment with the lightbulb. at midnight, thomas edison opened the door and walked in with his head held high.

1. he leaned on the wall and observed me carefully.

2. his harsh scrutiny made me self-conscious of my skills in the lab.

3. perhaps it was just me, but the air in the laboratory began to thicken as i found myself having difficulty to breathe.

4. i turned to look at him fully as i mentally prepared myself for what my very first words would be to thomas edison.

5. the next couple of seconds shocked me. it wasn't me who spoke, but rather him and with diction i could never think of using in a simple sentence.

--

hey, sorry if this was bad, i really didn't know what to write but i wanted to you. is there anything that you had to include within the excerpt?