What is Mr. Van Daan caught doing and how does this change our understanding of some of the past events in the Annex when it comes to their food supply?

This question is about "Anne Frank's diary"

He is caught stealing bread.

Explanation:

Mr. Van Daan was hiding with his family and the Frank family while he waited for the war to end and the Jews to live freely again.

The situation in the hideout was not the most comfortable and neither was the situation in the country. Food rationing was necessary because the production was small in the country. In the hideout, this rationing was even greater, however, Mr. Van Daan was caught stealing bread, which explains why other people who lived in the hideout were unable to eat bread and often did not satisfy their hunger.

1.creeping like a snail is a simile used in this poem and it means the child is going to school unwillingly./a child is unwilling to go to school.

2. man becomes very frail and loses his physical strength when he becomes old, so much that his leggings that used to fit him snugly when he was in his youth are now too loose for him to wear, and that his shank has shrunk so much that this worldly stage is too big for a feeble actor like him. although, 'his youthful hose' just refers to his leggings/pants/ to shrink from danger; to shrink from contact.

3.the words "sans" means "without." it is a french word that is often used in english even today. so he is saying that in the last age of a man, the man is without eyes, taste, or anything else. he also says that this is the "last stage of all" and that it is the stage that ends a man's "history."

hope this !

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.