1. The style is passionate, emotional, and personal.
2. The purpose is to inform about both sides of an issue, while favoring your side and disfavoring
the other side.
3. This paper or speech uses personal connection and emotion to make its points.
4. Phrases commonly seen in this paper or speech include, 'While it's true that" and
"Opponents will claim" and "In spite of the fact that"
5. This type pf paper or speech seeks to make a connection by presenting information, opinions,
and personal examples on one side of an issue.
6. This paper or speech wants to convince the audience their side is right, and also encourage
them to do something.
7. The style is logical, professional, and detached.
8. This type of paper or speech has a call to action.
9. This paper or speech favors one side of an issue, while also discussing why the other side is
wrong, or is not the best.
10. This paper or speech seeks to inform using resources, claims, and counterclaims to support
their side of an issue and show the other side isn't right, or isn't the best choice.
11. The purpose is to convince an audience that your side of an issue is the right one, while
avoiding mentioning the other side's points.
12. Phrases commonly seen in this paper or speech include, “You can help" And "Do you
want..." and "We deserve better"
13. This type discusses both sides of an issue, explaining why one side is right, or better.
14. This type discusses only their side of the issue, hardly mentioning the other side at all.
A
15. This type can use opinion and personal examples as their facts.
16. The type relies on fact, data, and information or examples from the experts.
17. This type wants to convince people to do something.
18. This paper or speech uses facts and data to make its points.
19. A phrase you might see in this type of speech or paper would be, "The other side saysbut
this is why they are not correct."
20. A phrase you might see in this type of speech or paper would be, "The best choice of action to
help make improvements is"
Each is either persuasive or argumentative!

the support that the author, uses in the article facing our fears is a): a definition of the part of the brain called the amygdala.

he takes neuroscientist joseph ledoux's words by telling that by falling to distinguish between evolutionary old systems located in the amygdala and newer systems, centered in the prefrontal cortex, doctors have conflated non conscious threat circuits in the brain with circuits that underlie the conscious experience of fear. that, the author says, "leads ledoux to the jarring conclusion that the amygdala, a decades-old centerpiece of the brain's fear circuit, does not underlie the conscious feeling of fear".

despite this, the author points out in the article that that is a controversial notion and that evidence, in animal and humans, supports the idea that core emotions can exist outside of conscious awareness.

many were disgusted, nauseated and shook their heads with disapproval upon finding out about the recycling of water process. however, they do not seem to understand that this process actually saves water.

although individuals may argue that it is unhealthy, and or unsafe to drink water that is "from toilet to tap" , the water is 100% safe to drink and involves forcing the water across a membrane, which "removes   any impurities, including viruses, pharmaceuticals and dissolved minerals" , according to paul rozin, a psychology professor who studies revulsion.

i agree that that the thought of drinking water that once ran through someones kitchen sink isn't quite appealing, but recycled wastewater is safe to drink. it also saves water. "the city produces nine million gallons a day" claims russell schreiber, the city’s director of public works.

recycled waste water has absolutely no health concerns whatsoever. when wastewater goes into a system, it's absorbed back into the ground. thus, it goes into a sewer system, then goes through a treatment process that removes contaminants before being released. nonetheless, there is no problem in drinking water that has been recycled.

"in drought-ed california, there are six state agencies that use wastewater that comes from an intellectual property source," according to the university of california, riverside. studies show that this water is completely safe to drink, however, it still doesn't mean people are going to happily pour it in a water glass.

researchers hope it "may make consumers more amenable to drinking recycled wastewater," extraordinarily, women who have a higher "disgust reaction" and make most consumer purchasing decisions.

explanation:

i dont know what the answer so im making you laugh here's ya joke lol