Read the passage.

Recess does not just have health benefits. It can actually create more productive students. Principal McLain said one result of allowing more recess time is that when the students return to the classroom, they quickly settle down and get to work, because they know another recess is coming. He also said that students are more successful problem solvers because they have time at recess to work out differences and learn to play together. Without more recess time, students are going to struggle to solve their problems.

Which word best replaces the underlined part of the paragraph to remove a logical fallacy?

will
might
shall continue to
have been known to

Shall continue to

Explanation:

The author's claim is that students should have more recess time. That is the point he/she is trying to prove. "Without more recess time" means "if the students don't have more recess time." The answer is not 'will,' because the author is trying to prove that students are already struggling with their problems and won't get better unless they have more recess time. It is not 'might,' because that is still negative for their point that students should have more recess time to not struggle with their problems. It is 'shall continue to' because the author is proving that students are already struggling with problems and will continue to struggle without more recess time.

answer: i dont know tbh

explanation: