Read the passage below and answer the questions that follow.
Since all root systems need nitrogen, all trees need nitrogen. Think about what would happen to you without oxygen. Would
you want that to happen to trees?
Describe the step-by-step process that you must follow in order to identify the implicit premise and evaluate the validity of
the argument is the argument valid? Is it sound?

Explanation

The big premise in the argument is the link between trees and oxygen. It's the assumption that, without trees, humans would have insufficient oxygen to survive. Trees DO produce a lot of oxygen, but the majority of it comes from photosynthetic organisms in the ocean. Killing off all of the trees would certainly be disastrous, and ecosystems would collapse, starving us to death in short order

the difference between an explicit and implicit meaning is that the explicit meaning of a poem is that the detail is exactly defined. nothing is left to interpretation. an implicit meaning is an implied meaning. kabir's poetry is both explicit and implicit in that it can be interpreted on different levels. the explicit meaning leaves nothing to interpretation while the implicit meaning leaves lots open to interpretation. an example of this is found in the poem "rumi and the spiritual lover". 

yes

explanation: