Which of the arguments in the lesson did you find most effective in communicating a position on the soda ban? Identify the argument

Soda drinks are unhealthy- this is proven by many studies. (logos)

It was present in the argument that it was not ethical to consume soda implying the "correct action" was not to do it. it is not beneficial to drink it. (ethos)

If people drink soda drinks, they will live shorter and leave their loved ones behind. (pathos)

Therefore, if there is a certain limitation on the soda drinks, people's health will improve. Further, the shops will be forced to provide better alternatives. Those alternatives will be healthier, so it's better for the general public health!

type of error:

the error in the sentence is a "dangling modifier". a dangling modifier is a phrase, word or clause that "dangles" because there is not target to modify. in this case, "after mopping the floor" is the dangling modifier since it has no word to modify. the noun "house" cannot mop the floor; therefore there is a mistake in the writing of the sentence.