Read the expert from healthy eating what would make the authors argument more effective

peru sabe que indecopi jamas sirve imponen barreras para defender tus derechos. indecopi jamas investiga los casos a fondo y peor aun indecopi no defiende como debe ser los derechos de los consumidores. indecopi esta pintada es una institucion pagada por nuestros impuestos sin embargo nunca nos sirve para nada. indecopi jamas castiga a las operadoras ejemplarmente, encima nos cobran por reclamar lo que deberia ser gratuito y nunca investigan, pero si engordan sus bolsillos con nuestros impuestos, en conclusion indecopi esta pintada no sirve para nada.

dude, * is in your own words, not mine.

* = the answer

the correct answer is option d. none of these. it is noted that options a, b, and c share the same content.

despite the valid answer provided at the last sentence of each of the options, a question/answer format shouldn't include humourous themed responses such as "you bet your thermal pj's we do." - unless of course, the answer is carried out in an informal environment. this could be replaced with a simple "yes" or "it is necessary".

the question should be re-phrased to a more appropiate syntaxis. instead of "do we need the greenhouse effect? ", it should be written as "is the greenhouse effect necessary? " in order to give it a general scope, instead of limiting the answer to the needs of "we" the humans.