Which is not necessary in a historical essay?
a) argumentative thesis statement
b) first-hand accounts
c) historical evidence
d) interpretive claims
e) properly cited resources

D). Interpretive claims.

Explanation:

A historical essay is described as an essay demonstrating claims regarding historical events substantiated by sufficient evidence to provide a wider clarity and understanding to the audience regarding that particular event.

As per the question, 'interpretive claims' are not necessary for a historical essay as such claims reflect the author's opinion or perception regarding the event or subject which is not much required in a historical essay. A historical essay is rather developed around references provided to support the claim and a conclusion based on it(not on the perceptions or opinions of the author). Thus, option D is the correct answer.

which lines in this excerpt from act i of shakespeare's romeo and juliet suggest that lord capulet respects free will?