Paulo wrote an article in favor of letting the history club use the library after school instead of the writing club, since the history club needs to use the library’s history books. He then found a study stating that having open access to books drastically improves students’ writing skills, since it enables them to draw inspiration from books, check sources, and compare their efforts with other writers’.

How should Paulo adjust his argument based on this new information?

A. He should revise his article in favor of allowing the two groups to take turns using the library.

B. He should argue that the school started its history club years before it formed the writing club.

C. He should ask the librarians which club is better behaved when they are studying in the library.

D. He should demonstrate that the history club currently has more members than the writing club.

A. He should revise his article in favor of allowing the two groups to take turns using the library.

Explanation:

Paulo's initial article was in favor of the history club to gain access to the library after school. With this, members of the club would be able to use the library's history books. The writting club had to use any other available venue for her meeting.

On realising also the importance of library to the writting club, he should  revise his article to describe the essence of library to the writting club. So that both clubs would be allowed to use the library in turns. With this, both clubs would have access to required materials and to also make full use of their books appropriately.

The revised article would clarify the usefulness of library to both clubs and reduce any form of inefficiency among members.

A

Explanation:

faulty parallelism is a grammar construction where there is no balance in the parts of a sentence they have a similar meaning but the grammar structure is not equivalent.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

jefferson wrote the declaration of independence, and he was the nation's third president.

the problem with the first version is that the sentence:

"jefferson was both the writer of the declaration of independence"

presents jefferson as both a subject and an agent for the verb "write" because if he was "the writer" then the declaration of independence was written by him, besides that fact, the sentence presents a dependent clause.

while the second sentence:

he was the nation's third president.

presents a basic subject+verb+object structure

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in both sentences:

jefferson wrote the declaration of independence, and he was the nation third president.

i think its c

independent