Lord darlington wasn't a bad man. he wasn't a bad man at all. and at least he had the privilege of being able to say at the end of his life that he made his own mistakes. his lordship was a courageous man. he chose a certain path in life, it proved to be a misguided one, but there, he chose it, he can say that at least. as for myself, i cannot even claim that. you see, i trusted. i trusted his lordship's wisdom. all those years i served him, i trusted i was doing something worthwhile. i can't even say i made my own mistakes. really -- one has to ask oneself -- what dignity is there in that

given the fact that the question is about the detail that best support the idea that oppressive leaders use   propaganda to achieve thir goals,   the first option does not refer to any kind of propaganda, since it only tells about that the milk and the windfall apple should be reserved for the pigs. in the second option, that is, "snowball and napoleon sent out flights of pigeons whose instructions were to mingle with the animals on the neighbouring farms, tell them the story of the rebellion, and teach them the tune of "beasts of england". it can be identified that the oppressors make use of the propaganda, which is represented by the pigeons, and the information they have to tell other animals about what was happening in the farm in order to get their objectives. for that reason, the right answer is the second option, taking into account that the third option do not refer to propaganda since it only talks about that they did not want jones back. and, finally, the last option refers to the result of the given news, but it does not mean about the propaganda they used to achieve their goals.

this is what i put and it was correct

it's a way for authors to communicate with reader in this time period. books from the past can teach us about life.

a omg *hides wit stranger*