1. I don't like foreign films with subtitles. I prefer ones.
2.I got a 10% on the coat because it had a button missing.
refund
bargain
discount
3.It was nice to see you again after such a long time. Let’s in touch tomorrow.
4.You can’t ride your motorbikes through here – it’s a area
residential
pedestrian
suburb
5.Megan was very of her sister after she was promoted.
jealous
ambitious
proud
6. I didn’t have breakfast this morning. I’m absolutely !
starving
thirsty
freezing
7.Sarah yoga for an hour every day. She says it’s very relaxing.
8.Can you the shoes you have in the window?
show
point
touch
9.My brother’s in the seventh form so he’s at school.
secondary
nursery
primary
10.Be careful what you say to Maria. She’s very .
irreliable
sensible
sincere
11.I’m afraid Katie isn’t in the office. Do you want to later?
12.We usually eat looking outside at the in summer.
terrace
roof
path
13.I got playing rugby last week. I sprained my ankle.
14.The Hobbit was New Zealand.
directed by
based on
filmed in
15.Rob’s the new sales manager, and is now in of 50 people.
16.I have little free time because I work .
temporary
part-time
full-time
17.I’m not going to spend the money I inherited. I’m going to it.
owe
waste
invest
18.I’m trying to cut on the amount of meat I eat.
19.We were late, but luckily there was a taxi very near the office.
platform
rank
station
20.It was very that Jeff drove past just after we’d missed the bus.
fortune
fortunate
unfortunate
21.We didn’t just the match – we destroyed the other team!
win
draw
beat
22.Ben the exam – he copied answers from the boy next to him.

Discount

. Get

. Pedestrian

. Proud

. Starving

. Does

. Primary  Sensible

1. Hurt  . Full time

Win

Passed

Explanation:

explanation:

the answer to your question is d because the clause conveys the tone of the man in the excerpt, which is arrogant and cocky. hope that .

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this