Which scenarios are considered ethically acceptable for journalists

A). Paying money to attend a conference about climate change in order to do research for an article.

C). Ending an investigation because it may lead to violence and disunity in a local community.

D). Interviewing the CEOs of two insurance companies that are competing against each other.

Explanation:

Ethically acceptable scenarios would be associated with the scenarios that are morally accurate and corresponds to impartiality, responsibility, credibility, truth, and ethics.

As per the question, options A, C, and D would be considered as ethically acceptable scenarios as they correspond to unbiased, authentic, and credible information to be presented to the viewers. 'paying money to attend a research' would assist in offering a wider dimension and credible information while 'ending an investigation as it may violence and disunity' exemplify 'responsibility' which is the key code of ethics and 'interviewing two CEO's' would help present an unbiased representation. Thus, options A, C, and D are correct.

the examples that saki used to represent satire through situational irony are options two (2) and five (5) inasmuch as the wolf thought that looking for a girl in the bushes could be as easy as hunting little pigs at the park, but it took him so much time to find the girl if it had not been not for a silly mistake. also, bertha would have survived to the wolf's hunt if she had not won those medals for goodness, which at the end they were what got her killed by making noise, so winning medals of goodness was not so good achievement, after all.