PLEASE HURRY ASAP

SOURCE 1: Rafters of Nostalgia is a strange movie that I hated from beginning to end. For one, the opening scene is not really a scene at all because the camera just focuses on an old urn resting in the corner of a dusty cottage for a good 10 minutes. No actors, no action, no nothing. Just urn. BORING!

SOURCE 2: Rafters of Nostalgia is a work of quiet genius that defies trends in modern movies. You won't see any explosions or superheroes here. Its opening scene forces the viewer to gaze upon an urn sitting in the corner of a house for an uncomfortable 10 minutes, providing an exhilarating opportunity to question the decreasing attention span of modern life.
Which statement best synthesizes information from both sources?
1 of 3 QUESTIONS
A person who wants a unique movie-watching experience should watch Rafters of Nostalgia.
A person who wants to take a significant other to a movie should avoid Rafters of Nostalgia.
A person who wants to be challenged by a work of genius should watch Rafters of Nostalgia.
A person who wants to actually enjoy going to the movies should avoid Rafters of Nostalgia.