These governments have also become adept at using those same [social media] channels to spread misinformation. “You can now create a narrative saying a democracy activist was a traitor . . . ,” says Anne Applebaum, an author who directs a program on radical political and economic change at the Legatum Institute in London. “The possibility of creating an alternative narrative is one people didn’t consider, and it turns out people in authoritarian regimes are quite good at it.”

What is Hempel’s claim in this excerpt?
What evidence does Hempel provide?
What type of evidence does Hempel use?

1. Regimes can use social media against protesters

2. Government creates false stories on social media

3. Testimony from an expert

Explanation:

I have already done it

constantly changes their schedule.

always on phone a lot more than normal.

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.