Can any proposal be justified if objectively analyzed and presented? Why or why not? Explain your answer in detail using specific examples from "A Modest Proposal"

No that is not true as is displayed by the book 'A modest Proposal'

Explanation:

A modest proposal is one of the most brilliant pieces of satire ever written and presents a very absurd argument.

The point is not to make the people to agree to the argument but to say that what it represents is based in reality and morally abhorrent.

By laying a factual and well argued claim for the fact one actually foes on to claim that the practice should not be done as it is wrong even though its being justified by the text itself

This is the prime point made by the text .

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)