Someone please do. 10 pts

Hi, can you show me a simple article, and I'll edit later, but here's what I got.

Say you disagreed with this:

"I love rabbits because they are so beautiful, fuzzy, and cute. They make great pets because they are calm, and prey animals, so they are vegan (no meat)."

Well, my summary could be this (Btw I LOVE rabbits this is just my example).

I disagree with this because I do not think they are calm, in fact, if spot a predator they will just go running fast. Prey animals make them weak. And what if I don't like my animal being vegan? Unlike my dog, when I feed her chicken, the rabbit will simply cower back.

My claim could be this:

I love dogs, because they are fast, protective, and fun! They can be played with, and are overall amazing! You can train it, teach it, and they will obey you. They will believe you are their masters, disobey at no cost.

You could state any website.

the price of our current war is high; it costs money and it costs lives.

but it does not cost our pride. it does not cost the guilt that would arise from knowing that we did nothing to intervene while our neighboring nations fell to despotic leaders.

it does not cost the terror of knowing that our allies are unstable. it does not cost the fear that we, too, will be next to fall.

which sentence most accurately explains why the speaker's use of the parallel structure is effective in this passage?

a. it underscores that disagreement will not be tolerated and will be dealt with swiftly.

b. it makes the speaker seem like a decisive and capable leader.

c. it emphasizes reasons to fight and inspires listeners to aid the war effort.

d. it establishes the speaker's credibility by acknowledging the difficulties of war.

is it "means of nourishment"