Examine the text regarding the conversation between Utterson and Jekyll at the window. Examine the thoughts and feelings that remained unspoken between the two old friends. 1. What might they have been thinking about? 2. Why did the men not share their thoughts and feelings? 3. What would you have done in that situation?

Refute it, showing why it is mistaken—an apparent but not real problem; acknowledge its validity or plausibility, but suggest why on balance it's relatively less important or less likely than what you propose, and thus doesn't overturn it; concede its force and complicate your idea accordingly—restate your thesis in a more exact, qualified, or nuanced way that takes account of the objection, or start a new section in which you consider your topic in light of it. this will work if the counterargument concerns only an aspect of your argument; if it undermines your whole case, you need a new thesis.

One is experience and one is not and then criminal is like who rob someone in there house and justice system trouble race because one is experience and one is not that what i think

Ashould be the answer